PARUL ASHOK SHAH vs SHREE SIDDIVINAYAK INFRASTRUCTURE AND REALTY Advocate - M P SAVLA AND CO — S/226/2025

Case under Special Marriage Act Section 1007. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020346452024

e-Filing Number

14-11-2024

Filing Number

S/34636/2024

Filing Date

18-Nov-2024

Registration No

S/226/2025

Registration Date

18-Aug-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Single

Category

SUITS ( 38 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Special Marriage Act Section 1007

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARUL ASHOK SHAH

    Adv. Maniar Srivastava Associates

  2. 2.ASHOK KIRTANALAL SHAH

    Adv. Maniar Srivastava Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHREE SIDDIVINAYAK INFRASTRUCTURE AND REALTY Advocate - M P SAVLA AND CO

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

    Case Outcome Summary: In suit 5 S/226/2025, the court adjourned the case to 06.05.2026. The plaintiff was granted time to serve the defendant with a Writ of Summons and file an affidavit of service, with a warning that failure to comply with O.S. Rule 87 will result in suit dismissal. Liberty was granted to serve the defendant through the defendant's advocate on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    For Direction

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  5. 23-Jul-2025

    Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF

  6. 25-Jun-2025

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

  7. 25-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 18-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. S/226/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Outcome Summary: In suit 5 S/226/2025, the court adjourned the case to 06.05.2026. The plaintiff was granted time to serve the defendant with a Writ of Summons and file an affidavit of service, with a warning that failure to comply with O.S. Rule 87 will result in suit dismissal. Liberty was granted to serve the defendant through the defendant's advocate on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case