ASHOK KIRTANALAL SHAH vs SHREE SIDDIVINAYAK INFRASTRUCTURE AND REALTY Advocate - M P SAVLA AND CO — S/267/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 1007. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020346372024
e-Filing Number
14-11-2024
Filing Number
S/34628/2024
Filing Date
18-Nov-2024
Registration No
S/267/2025
Registration Date
18-Sep-2025
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Single
Category
SUITS ( 38 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 05-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHOK KIRTANALAL SHAH
Adv. Maniar Srivastava Associates
-
2.PARUL ASHOK SHAH
Adv. Maniar Srivastava Associates
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHREE SIDDIVINAYAK INFRASTRUCTURE AND REALTY Advocate - M P SAVLA AND CO
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
08-Apr-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
Case Adjourned with Directions for Service In suit 6 S/267/2025, the court adjourned the matter to 06.05.2026 and permitted the plaintiff to serve the defendant with a Writ of Summons and file an affidavit of service by the next date. The plaintiff was also granted liberty to serve the defendant through the defendant's advocate on record, with the warning that failure to comply with O.S. Rule 87 will result in dismissal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
-
27-Mar-2026
For Direction
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
-
17-Sep-2025
Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF
-
02-Sep-2025
Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF
-
13-Aug-2025
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
-
13-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. S/267/2025
Case Adjourned with Directions for Service In suit 6 S/267/2025, the court adjourned the matter to 06.05.2026 and permitted the plaintiff to serve the defendant with a Writ of Summons and file an affidavit of service by the next date. The plaintiff was also granted liberty to serve the defendant through the defendant's advocate on record, with the warning that failure to comply with O.S. Rule 87 will result in dismissal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts