M/S KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED vs AVINASH VINODKUMAR SINGH — HCBM20341812025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

Next hearing 09-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM020341812025

Filing Number

EXA/34181/2025

Filing Date

18-Oct-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED

    Adv. ASHWIN S TRIPATHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AVINASH VINODKUMAR SINGH

  2. 2.POONAM VINOD SINGH

Case History

  1. 09-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications (Serial Nos. 902-1169) after finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court set aside all arbitral awards and dismissed related Commercial Execution Applications, Interim Applications, and Chamber Summons. Parties are permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the limitation period extended to exclude time spent in the prior invalid arbitration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 18-Oct-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications (Serial Nos. 902-1169) after finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court set aside all arbitral awards and dismissed related Commercial Execution Applications, Interim Applications, and Chamber Summons. Parties are permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the limitation period extended to exclude time spent in the prior invalid arbitration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case