SAGAR KANTILAL DEVRE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND 5 ORS. Advocate - GP OS — WP/2054/2023
Case under Electricity Regulatory Commission (Electricity Supply Code and Other Conditions of Supply) Regulations (Maharashtra) Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020336582022
Filing Number
WP/33652/2022
Filing Date
20-10-2022
Registration No
WP/2054/2023
Registration Date
15-07-2023
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAGAR KANTILAL DEVRE
Adv. Prasad Wagh
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND 5 ORS. Advocate - GP OS
MAHAVITRAN, MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,
Adv. DSK LEGAL
MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION CO. LTD.
SAMTA BUILDERS PVT.LTD.
RUNWAL GROUP
Adv. Abhay Nevagi and Associates
KALPATARU GROUP
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-12-2022 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 03-11-2023 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 07-05-2025 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 30-04-2025 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 23-04-2025 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Sagar Kantilal Devre against the State of Maharashtra for want of prosecution on 15th April 2026. The dismissal was ordered because no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner during the hearing, indicating abandonment of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Sagar Kantilal Devre against the State of Maharashtra for want of prosecution on 15th April 2026. The dismissal was ordered because no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner during the hearing, indicating abandonment of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts