LEENA MATHAIS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE GOVERNMENT PLEADER OFFICE Advocate - GP OS — WP/1593/2025

Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020336102024

Filing Number

WP/33603/2024

Filing Date

04-Nov-2024

Registration No

WP/1593/2025

Registration Date

29-Apr-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Bench Type

Division

Category

SLUM AREAS ( 49 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 06-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LEENA MATHAIS

    Adv. Hemant Ghadigaonkar

  2. 2.IRENE BENIDICTA MATHIAS

  3. 3.SALEMA RAJAN MATHAIS

  4. 4.CYNTHIA KAISAR ALI

  5. 5.CELINA LAWRENCE MATHIS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE GOVERNMENT PLEADER OFFICE Advocate - GP OS

  2. 2.CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

    Adv. LITTLE AND COMPANY

  3. 3.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MIDC DIVISION-I

    Adv. LITTLE AND COMPANY

  4. 4.DEPUTY ENGINEER MIDC MAROL DIVISION

    Adv. LITTLE AND COMPANY

  5. 5.CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SRA

    Adv. PATIL NISHIGANDH NANDKUMAR

  6. 6.DIVISIONAL KOKAN COMMISSIONER

    Adv. GP OS

  7. 7.HUBTOWN LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

    The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing petitioners declared ineligible for the Slums Scheme to file their grievances before the MIDC's Grievance Redressal Committee within 2 weeks, with the committee required to decide the matter on its merits within 12 weeks of receiving the complaint. The court kept all contentions open while redirecting the matter to the administrative grievance mechanism rather than deciding the substantive issues in the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF

  5. 18-Nov-2025

    High On Board (Hob)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe

  6. 11-Nov-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe

  7. 04-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF

  8. 04-Nov-2025

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe

  9. 03-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF

  10. 03-Nov-2025

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe

  11. 20-Feb-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata

  12. 18-Dec-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF

  13. 18-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 04-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/1593/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing petitioners declared ineligible for the Slums Scheme to file their grievances before the MIDC's Grievance Redressal Committee within 2 weeks, with the committee required to decide the matter on its merits within 12 weeks of receiving the complaint. The court kept all contentions open while redirecting the matter to the administrative grievance mechanism rather than deciding the substantive issues in the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case