AU SMALL FINANCE BANK S G LEGAL AND ASSOCIATES vs SHABANA NADEEM — EXA/2695/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020325292023

Filing Number

EXA/32517/2023

Filing Date

22-Nov-2023

Registration No

EXA/2695/2024

Registration Date

01-Oct-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AU SMALL FINANCE BANK S G LEGAL AND ASSOCIATES

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHABANA NADEEM

  2. 2.NADEEM SHANAWAZ SAYYED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple arbitration applications because the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's ruling in Bhadra International that such appointments are void ab initio. All related arbitral awards were set aside, and the court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previous litigation period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 12-Aug-2024

    Shri. S. B. Bhansali (Prothonotary Senior Master))View PDF

  5. 12-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 22-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2695/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple arbitration applications because the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's ruling in Bhadra International that such appointments are void ab initio. All related arbitral awards were set aside, and the court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previous litigation period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case