MALABAR GOLD AND DIAMONDS LIMITED vs META PLATFORMS INC (OPERATING DIGITAL PLATFORMS SUCH AS INSTAGRAM, FACEBOOK AND WHATSAPP) — IA/2343/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

Next hearing 06-May-2026

CNR: HCBM020324252025

Filing Number

IA/32424/2025

Filing Date

08-Oct-2025

Registration No

IA/2343/2026

Registration Date

27-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

Bench Type

Single

Category

SUITS ( 38 )

Sub-Category

OTHER ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1
Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MALABAR GOLD AND DIAMONDS LIMITED

    Adv. Pan India Legal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.META PLATFORMS INC (OPERATING DIGITAL PLATFORMS SUCH AS INSTAGRAM, FACEBOOK AND WHATSAPP)

  2. 2.X (FORMERLY TWITTER)

  3. 3.GOOGLE LLC, (OPERATING ITS DIGITAL PLATFORM YOUTUBE)

  4. 4.THE PAMPHLET (THROUGH OWNER AASHISH NAUTIYAL AND FOUNDER EDITOR SHIV K. MISHRA)

  5. 5.ONLY FACT (SOCIAL MEDIA NEW AGENCY, THROUGH ITS OWNER VIJAY PATEL TWITTER HANDLE @VIJAYGAJERA

  6. 6.LATEST, NEWSPAPER AGENCY BASED IN KERALA

  7. 7.ABC MALYALAM NEWS, NEWS-BASED INFOTAINMENT CHANNEL

  8. 8.JAB STUDIOS (INFLUENCER AGENCY)

  9. 9.ASHOK KUMAR, BEING UNKNOWN PERSON

  10. 10.CYBER POLICE STATION (PROPOSED)

    Adv. GP OS

Case History

  1. 06-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    First On Board (Fob)

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF

    Case Summary: IA/2343/2026 Court Order (17 April 2026): The court directed Malabar Gold and Diamonds Limited to serve defendants (Meta Platforms, X, and Google LLC) with Writs of Summons and file affidavits of service by the next hearing date (30 June 2026), failing which the suit will be dismissed for non-compliance with O.S. Rule 87. The plaintiff was granted liberty to serve defendants through all modes including service upon their advocates, and must resolve office objections to two interim applications within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    First On Board (Fob)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    First On Board (Fob)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    -For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  9. 21-Jan-2026

    For Ad-Interim Relief

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  10. 14-Jan-2026

    For Ad-Interim Relief

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  11. 07-Jan-2026

    For Ad-Interim Relief

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  12. 10-Dec-2025

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  13. 19-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  14. 19-Nov-2025

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  15. 17-Nov-2025

    For Ad-Interim Relief

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  16. 11-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  17. 14-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  18. 14-Oct-2025

    For Ad-Interim Relief

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  19. 13-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  20. 13-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 08-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/2343/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA/2343/2026 Court Order (17 April 2026): The court directed Malabar Gold and Diamonds Limited to serve defendants (Meta Platforms, X, and Google LLC) with Writs of Summons and file affidavits of service by the next hearing date (30 June 2026), failing which the suit will be dismissed for non-compliance with O.S. Rule 87. The plaintiff was granted liberty to serve defendants through all modes including service upon their advocates, and must resolve office objections to two interim applications within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case