L AND T FINANCE LIMITED vs JOGENDRA JAIPRAKASH MISHRA AND 2 ORS AND CFM ASSET RECONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED (APPLICANT) — IA/1671/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 17th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020323462019
Filing Number
IA/1671/2019
Filing Date
06-Dec-2019
Registration No
IA/1671/2019
Registration Date
06-Dec-2019
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
17-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.L AND T FINANCE LIMITED
Respondent(s)
-
1.JOGENDRA JAIPRAKASH MISHRA AND 2 ORS AND CFM ASSET RECONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED (APPLICANT)
Adv. DS LAW,APPLICANT 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF
Summary of IA/1671/2019 in Execution Application No. 2309/2015 The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral awards and dismissed all execution applications after finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and void ab initio, following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International. The court permitted the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previous limitation period excluded, while allowing the possibility of waiving arbitrator ineligibility through express written agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Dec-2019
A
Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. Master
-
06-Dec-2019
Case filed
Registration No. IA/1671/2019
Summary of IA/1671/2019 in Execution Application No. 2309/2015 The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral awards and dismissed all execution applications after finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and void ab initio, following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International. The court permitted the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previous limitation period excluded, while allowing the possibility of waiving arbitrator ineligibility through express written agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts