SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO LTD vs VISHAL DILIP BHINDE AND ANR — EXA/2504/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020321842022
Filing Number
EXA/32178/2022
Filing Date
07-Oct-2022
Registration No
EXA/2504/2024
Registration Date
05-Sep-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 10-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO LTD
Adv. SACHIN V DERE
Respondent(s)
-
1.VISHAL DILIP BHINDE AND ANR
-
2.RAMESH KUMAR MISHRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications and set aside arbitral awards where sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, following the Supreme Court's ruling in *Bhadra International v. Airports Authority of India* that such appointments are void ab initio. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the period from original invocation excluded from limitation periods, provided no written agreement exists waiving the ineligibility objection under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
05-Jul-2024
Shri. S. B. Bhansali (Prothonotary Senior Master))View PDF
-
05-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Oct-2022
Case filed
Registration No. EXA/2504/2024
The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications and set aside arbitral awards where sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, following the Supreme Court's ruling in *Bhadra International v. Airports Authority of India* that such appointments are void ab initio. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the period from original invocation excluded from limitation periods, provided no written agreement exists waiving the ineligibility objection under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts