SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs SANJAY NIVRUTTI PATIL(BORROWER) AND ANR — EXA/289/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020317132022
Filing Number
EXA/31707/2022
Filing Date
01-Oct-2022
Registration No
EXA/289/2023
Registration Date
18-Feb-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 10-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Adv. Vishwanath Patil,Ahya Kewal Bharatkumar,Ahya Kewal Bharatkumar, ,Ahya Kewal Bharatkumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANJAY NIVRUTTI PATIL(BORROWER) AND ANR
-
2.DILIP RAMDULAR SINGH(GUARANTOR)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications involving unilateral arbitrator appointments, holding that such appointments are void ab initio following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International v. Airports Authority of India. The court set aside all related arbitral awards and execution applications, while permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded from calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
01-Oct-2022
Case filed
Registration No. EXA/289/2023
The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications involving unilateral arbitrator appointments, holding that such appointments are void ab initio following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International v. Airports Authority of India. The court set aside all related arbitral awards and execution applications, while permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded from calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts