INTEGRO FINSERV PRIVATE LIMITED vs ARUN S/O MADAN PATIL (BORROWER) — HCBM20307892025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020307892025
Filing Number
EXA/30789/2025
Filing Date
25-Sep-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 10-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.INTEGRO FINSERV PRIVATE LIMITED
Adv. DS Law
Respondent(s)
-
1.ARUN S/O MADAN PATIL (BORROWER)
-
2.NAGARAJ (CO-BORROWER)
Case History
-
09-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed all applications (Serial Nos. 902-985, 987-1117, 1120-1121, 1124-1134, 1138-1151, 1154-1169) and set aside the respective arbitral awards, finding that the sole arbitrator appointments were unilateral and therefore void ab initio, following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, except where express written agreements waive such ineligibility under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
25-Sep-2025
Case filed
Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed all applications (Serial Nos. 902-985, 987-1117, 1120-1121, 1124-1134, 1138-1151, 1154-1169) and set aside the respective arbitral awards, finding that the sole arbitrator appointments were unilateral and therefore void ab initio, following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, except where express written agreements waive such ineligibility under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts