INTEGRO FINSERV PRIVATE LIMITED vs ARUN S/O MADAN PATIL (BORROWER) — HCBM20307892025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

Next hearing 09-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM020307892025

Filing Number

EXA/30789/2025

Filing Date

25-Sep-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INTEGRO FINSERV PRIVATE LIMITED

    Adv. DS Law

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ARUN S/O MADAN PATIL (BORROWER)

  2. 2.NAGARAJ (CO-BORROWER)

Case History

  1. 09-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed all applications (Serial Nos. 902-985, 987-1117, 1120-1121, 1124-1134, 1138-1151, 1154-1169) and set aside the respective arbitral awards, finding that the sole arbitrator appointments were unilateral and therefore void ab initio, following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, except where express written agreements waive such ineligibility under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 25-Sep-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed all applications (Serial Nos. 902-985, 987-1117, 1120-1121, 1124-1134, 1138-1151, 1154-1169) and set aside the respective arbitral awards, finding that the sole arbitrator appointments were unilateral and therefore void ab initio, following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, except where express written agreements waive such ineligibility under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case