L and T FINANCE LIMITED vs M/S. MAHINDER FREIGHT CARRIERS AND 2 ORS — EXA/2297/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020306922014

Filing Number

EXA/2366/2014

Filing Date

31-Dec-2014

Registration No

EXA/2297/2015

Registration Date

28-Oct-2015

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.L and T FINANCE LIMITED

    Adv. S. I. Joshi and Co.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S. MAHINDER FREIGHT CARRIERS AND 2 ORS

  2. 2.MR. PALWINDER SINGH SAMRA S/O MR.DALIP SINGH SAMRA

  3. 3.MR.SUKHVINDER SINGH SAMRA S/O MR. DALIP SINGH SAMRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    Case Summary: L & T Finance Ltd. vs. M/s. Mahinder Freight Carriers (EXA/2297/2015) The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral awards and dismissed the execution application after finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral, which is void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. The court permitted the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with time excluded from the period of the original arbitration invocation, except where parties have expressly waived ineligibility under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

  4. 31-Dec-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2297/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: L & T Finance Ltd. vs. M/s. Mahinder Freight Carriers (EXA/2297/2015) The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral awards and dismissed the execution application after finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral, which is void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. The court permitted the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with time excluded from the period of the original arbitration invocation, except where parties have expressly waived ineligibility under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case