Shrikant Hariram Mhaprolkar vs Hariram Dhonduji Mhaprolkar (Deceased) — TP/5611/2024

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 278. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020306472024

e-Filing Number

05-09-2024

Filing Number

TP/30639/2024

Filing Date

07-Oct-2024

Registration No

TP/5611/2024

Registration Date

02-Dec-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Letters of Administration without Will ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 278

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shrikant Hariram Mhaprolkar

    Adv. Anjali Binjola,Anjali Binjola,Anjali Binjola, ,Anjali Binjola

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Hariram Dhonduji Mhaprolkar (Deceased)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/5611/2024 Outcome: The Bombay High Court granted the testamentary petition and allowed Shrikant Hariram Mhaprolkar to proceed with obtaining a Grant of Administration. The court dispensed with the surety requirement for the non-consenting legal heir (the deceased's sister) based on the close family relationship between the petitioner and non-consenting heir. The court accepted the filed Administration Bond as adequate and directed the Department to issue the Grant in accordance with law, also dispensing with an earlier objection dated 16.07.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Due Matters - Adjourned OS

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

  8. 27-Jan-2026

    For Compliance

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

  9. 01-Dec-2025

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

  10. 01-Dec-2025

    For Compliance

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

  11. 10-Oct-2025

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

  12. 10-Oct-2025

    For Compliance

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

  13. 14-Aug-2025

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

  14. 14-Aug-2025

    For Compliance

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

  15. 16-Jul-2025

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

  16. 26-Jun-2025

    For Compliance

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

  17. 05-May-2025

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

  18. 05-May-2025

    For Compliance

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

  19. 24-Mar-2025

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

  20. 24-Mar-2025

    For Compliance

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

  21. 05-Feb-2025

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

  22. 05-Feb-2025

    For Direction

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

  23. 12-Dec-2024

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

  24. 12-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 07-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/5611/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/5611/2024 Outcome: The Bombay High Court granted the testamentary petition and allowed Shrikant Hariram Mhaprolkar to proceed with obtaining a Grant of Administration. The court dispensed with the surety requirement for the non-consenting legal heir (the deceased's sister) based on the close family relationship between the petitioner and non-consenting heir. The court accepted the filed Administration Bond as adequate and directed the Department to issue the Grant in accordance with law, also dispensing with an earlier objection dated 16.07.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case