LALBAHADUR RAMYASH YADAV vs ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COLLECTOR -EAST SUBURBS (ENCROACHMENT /REMOVAL) — WP/2438/2026
Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020304492025
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/30449/2025
Filing Date
23-09-2025
Registration No
WP/2438/2026
Registration Date
13-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Bench Type
Division
Category
SLUM AREAS ( 49 )
Sub-Category
Slum areas ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LALBAHADUR RAMYASH YADAV
Adv. Amey C Sawant
Respondent(s)
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COLLECTOR -EAST SUBURBS (ENCROACHMENT /REMOVAL)
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, L WARD, BRIHANUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
Summary: Writ Petition No. 2438 of 2026 was disposed of by the Bombay High Court on 12 June 2026. The petition, filed by Lalbahadur Ramyash Yadav against the Additional District Collector and Mumbai Municipal Corporation regarding encroachment removal, had already been decided by court order dated 25 September 2025. With counsel confirming nothing further remained to be done, the court removed the matter from the board and ordered it not be listed hereafter. The petitioner retains the right to pursue appropriate remedies if aggrieved by non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Writ Petition No. 2438 of 2026 was disposed of by the Bombay High Court on 12 June 2026. The petition, filed by Lalbahadur Ramyash Yadav against the Additional District Collector and Mumbai Municipal Corporation regarding encroachment removal, had already been decided by court order dated 25 September 2025. With counsel confirming nothing further remained to be done, the court removed the matter from the board and ordered it not be listed hereafter. The petitioner retains the right to pursue appropriate remedies if aggrieved by non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts