LALBAHADUR RAMYASH YADAV vs ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COLLECTOR -EAST SUBURBS (ENCROACHMENT /REMOVAL) — WP/2438/2026
Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020304492025
Filing Number
WP/30449/2025
Filing Date
23-Sep-2025
Registration No
WP/2438/2026
Registration Date
13-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Bench Type
Division
Category
SLUM AREAS ( 49 )
Sub-Category
Slum areas ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LALBAHADUR RAMYASH YADAV
Adv. Amey C Sawant
Respondent(s)
-
1.ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COLLECTOR -EAST SUBURBS (ENCROACHMENT /REMOVAL)
-
2.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, L WARD, BRIHANUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
-
3.THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
Summary: Writ Petition No. 2438 of 2026 was disposed of by the Bombay High Court on 12 June 2026. The petition, filed by Lalbahadur Ramyash Yadav against the Additional District Collector and Mumbai Municipal Corporation regarding encroachment removal, had already been decided by court order dated 25 September 2025. With counsel confirming nothing further remained to be done, the court removed the matter from the board and ordered it not be listed hereafter. The petitioner retains the right to pursue appropriate remedies if aggrieved by non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jun-2026
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
-
23-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2438/2026
Summary: Writ Petition No. 2438 of 2026 was disposed of by the Bombay High Court on 12 June 2026. The petition, filed by Lalbahadur Ramyash Yadav against the Additional District Collector and Mumbai Municipal Corporation regarding encroachment removal, had already been decided by court order dated 25 September 2025. With counsel confirming nothing further remained to be done, the court removed the matter from the board and ordered it not be listed hereafter. The petitioner retains the right to pursue appropriate remedies if aggrieved by non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts