Brijraj Kumari vs DIGVIJAY SINGH Advocate - Divya , AMAN LEEKHA — S/358/2025

Case under Hindu Succession Act , 1956 Section 15(2)a,16. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: HCBM020299432025

Next Hearing

: -

e-Filing Number

19-09-2025

Filing Number

S/29943/2025

Filing Date

19-09-2025

Registration No

S/358/2025

Registration Date

24-11-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Single

Category

SUITS ( 38 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Hindu Succession Act , 1956 Section 15(2)a,16
C.P.C.- (Interlocutory Order) Section ---

Petitioner(s)

Brijraj Kumari

Adv. M/S. RUSTAMJI and GINWALA

Respondent(s)

DIGVIJAY SINGH Advocate - Divya , AMAN LEEKHA

BHAWANA KUMARI

BANDANA KUMARI

Adv. Divya,AMAN LEEKHA

KALPANA KUMARI

Adv. Divya,AMAN LEEKHA

RAGHURAJ KUMARI

Adv. Divya,AMAN LEEKHA

PRITI DEVI

Adv. Anand Gandhi

KRISHNA RAJAYALAXMI

Adv. Anand Gandhi

HANVANT SINGH

Hearing History

Judge: Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

17-04-2026

FOR DIRECTION

Orders

17-04-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Case Summary: S/358/2025 Outcome: The court transferred the suit to the "Undefended Suits" list. For defendants 1, 3-5, the transfer is conditional on the court's decision on their pending Interim Application for condonation of delay in filing written statements. Defendants 2, 6-8 were unconditionally transferred to the Undefended Suits list as they failed to file written statements despite proper service and did not seek condonation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S/358/2025 Outcome: The court transferred the suit to the "Undefended Suits" list. For defendants 1, 3-5, the transfer is conditional on the court's decision on their pending Interim Application for condonation of delay in filing written statements. Defendants 2, 6-8 were unconditionally transferred to the Undefended Suits list as they failed to file written statements despite proper service and did not seek condonation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case