DHAVAL BALWANTRAI MEHTA vs OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, HATHKANAGALE 503 (E- — WP/1722/2026

Case under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020298792024

Filing Number

WP/29871/2024

Filing Date

30-Sep-2024

Registration No

WP/1722/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS ( 10 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHAVAL BALWANTRAI MEHTA

    Adv. Iyanah Parbhoo

  2. 2.SHITAL DHAVAL MEHTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, HATHKANAGALE 503 (E-

  2. 2.Advocate - GP OS

  3. 3.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS GOVERNMENT PLEADER

    Adv. GP OS

  4. 4.EDELWEISS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD.

    Adv. SHASHANK N FADIA

  5. 5.PANCHSHEEL HEIGHTS C AND D CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED

  6. 6.PRATAP M MODI

  7. 7.ROHIT PRATAP MODI

  8. 8.CHITRANGI ROHIT MODI

  9. 9.NIRANJANA PRATAP MODI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

    The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous after the petitioners, auction purchasers of flats, filed an additional affidavit showing that the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax had withdrawn its objection via letter dated 08/10/2024 and confirmed no encumbrance on the property. The court found the petitioners' grievance satisfied as the housing society had already issued share certificates in their favor, rendering further adjudication unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

  6. 07-May-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye , Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar

  7. 07-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye,hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. ChandurkarView PDF

  8. 07-Mar-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye , Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar

  9. 23-Jan-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye,hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. ChandurkarView PDF

  10. 23-Jan-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil , Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar

  11. 13-Dec-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil,hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. ChandurkarView PDF

  12. 13-Dec-2024

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil , Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar

  13. 25-Nov-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil,hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. ChandurkarView PDF

  14. 25-Nov-2024

    For Circulation (Urgent Admission)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil , Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar

  15. 14-Oct-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil,hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. ChandurkarView PDF

  16. 14-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 30-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/1722/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous after the petitioners, auction purchasers of flats, filed an additional affidavit showing that the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax had withdrawn its objection via letter dated 08/10/2024 and confirmed no encumbrance on the property. The court found the petitioners' grievance satisfied as the housing society had already issued share certificates in their favor, rendering further adjudication unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case