SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO. LTD. vs SUJITKUMAR RAMLAL PASI (BORROWER) AND ANR — EXA/936/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020296822021
Filing Number
EXA/29598/2021
Filing Date
16-Dec-2021
Registration No
EXA/936/2023
Registration Date
06-Jul-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 07-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO. LTD.
Adv. Minal Sachin Gangan,Sachin S. Gangan,Sachin S. Gangan, ,Sachin S. Gangan
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUJITKUMAR RAMLAL PASI (BORROWER) AND ANR
-
2.MANOJKUMAR RAMLAL PASI (GUARANTOR)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 applications and set aside all arbitral awards where the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's decision in *Bhadra International v. Airports Authority of India* that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previous limitation period excluded, except where parties have expressly waived their objection rights under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
16-Dec-2021
Case filed
Registration No. EXA/936/2023
Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 applications and set aside all arbitral awards where the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's decision in *Bhadra International v. Airports Authority of India* that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previous limitation period excluded, except where parties have expressly waived their objection rights under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts