SUNDARAM FINANCE LIMITED NAYAYAN R. AWATE vs JITENDRA I TIWARI — EXA/14/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020293642025

Filing Number

EXA/29364/2025

Filing Date

16-Sep-2025

Registration No

EXA/14/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNDARAM FINANCE LIMITED NAYAYAN R. AWATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JITENDRA I TIWARI

  2. 2.POONAM JITENDRA TIWARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple consolidated applications, holding that unilateral appointment of sole arbitrators is void ab initio, following Supreme Court precedent in *Bhadra International v. AAI*. All resulting arbitral awards were set aside, and parties are permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, unless express written agreement waives objections under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 16-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/14/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple consolidated applications, holding that unilateral appointment of sole arbitrators is void ab initio, following Supreme Court precedent in *Bhadra International v. AAI*. All resulting arbitral awards were set aside, and parties are permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, unless express written agreement waives objections under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case