Fidesta Logistics Private Limited vs Union Of India — WP/4894/2024

Case under Central Goods and Service Tax Act Section Section74. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.

Next hearing 29-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM020293322024

e-Filing Number

24-09-2024

Filing Number

WP/29325/2024

Filing Date

24-Sep-2024

Registration No

WP/4894/2024

Registration Date

08-Nov-2024

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam

Bench Type

Division

Category

INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )

Sub-Category

GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Central Goods and Service Tax Act Section Section74

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Fidesta Logistics Private Limited

    Adv. UBR Legal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Union Of India

    Adv. ,Kavita Shukla ,Kavita Shukla 1123

  2. 2.State of Maharashtra

  3. 3.Additional Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise

Case History

  1. 29-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Jul-2026

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Suman ShyamView PDF

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF

    Summary of WP/4894/2024 - Fidesta Logistics Private Limited v. Union of India Case Status: REFERRED TO LARGER BENCH Court: Bombay High Court (Division Bench) Judges: G.S. Kulkarni & Aarti Sathe, JJ. Date: 17 April 2026 --- Key Issue Whether consolidated/bunched show-cause notices covering multiple financial years can be issued under Sections 73/74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act). --- Current Position The Court has NOT decided the main issue on merits but has referred the matter to a Larger Bench due to conflicting High Court decisions and significant legal questions requiring authoritative resolution. --- Critical Finding The Division Bench noted irreconcilable conflict in judicial precedent: - Milroc Good Earth Developers (Bombay HC): Consolidated notices impermissible - Mathur Polymers & Ambika Traders (Delhi HC): Consolidated notices permissible - S.A. Aromatics (Allahabad HC): Consolidated notices permissible The Supreme Court dismissed the SLP in Mathur Polymers (7 Nov 2025) without interfering, giving implied approval to consolidated notices. --- Questions Referred to Larger Bench 1. Whether sub-section (10) of Sections 73/74 controls sub-section (1), prohibiting consolidated notices 2. Whether sub-section (10) per se prohibits consolidated notices for multiple years 3. Effect of Section 160 on consolidated show-cause notices 4. Whether Milroc decision correctly states the law 5. Legal position established by Supreme Court's Mathur Polymers order under Article 141 --- Interim Relief All existing interim orders continue until the Larger Bench decides the issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    High On Board (Hob)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe

  9. 13-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF

  10. 13-Feb-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe

  11. 12-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF

  12. 11-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF

  13. 22-Jul-2025

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Colabawalla , Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla

  14. 06-May-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Colabawalla,hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze PooniwallaView PDF

  15. 06-May-2025

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Colabawalla , Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla

  16. 01-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Colabawalla,hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze PooniwallaView PDF

  17. 01-Apr-2025

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Colabawalla , Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla

  18. 11-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Colabawalla,hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze PooniwallaView PDF

  19. 11-Mar-2025

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Colabawalla , Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla

  20. 25-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Colabawalla,hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze PooniwallaView PDF

  21. 25-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 24-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4894/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP/4894/2024 - Fidesta Logistics Private Limited v. Union of India Case Status: REFERRED TO LARGER BENCH Court: Bombay High Court (Division Bench) Judges: G.S. Kulkarni & Aarti Sathe, JJ. Date: 17 April 2026 --- Key Issue Whether consolidated/bunched show-cause notices covering multiple financial years can be issued under Sections 73/74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act). --- Current Position The Court has NOT decided the main issue on merits but has referred the matter to a Larger Bench due to conflicting High Court decisions and significant legal questions requiring authoritative resolution. --- Critical Finding The Division Bench noted irreconcilable conflict in judicial precedent: - Milroc Good Earth Developers (Bombay HC): Consolidated notices impermissible - Mathur Polymers & Ambika Traders (Delhi HC): Consolidated notices permissible - S.A. Aromatics (Allahabad HC): Consolidated notices permissible The Supreme Court dismissed the SLP in Mathur Polymers (7 Nov 2025) without interfering, giving implied approval to consolidated notices. --- Questions Referred to Larger Bench 1. Whether sub-section (10) of Sections 73/74 controls sub-section (1), prohibiting consolidated notices 2. Whether sub-section (10) per se prohibits consolidated notices for multiple years 3. Effect of Section 160 on consolidated show-cause notices 4. Whether Milroc decision correctly states the law 5. Legal position established by Supreme Court's Mathur Polymers order under Article 141 --- Interim Relief All existing interim orders continue until the Larger Bench decides the issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case