GIA India Laboratory Private Limited LUMIERE LAW PARTNERS vs The Union of India — WP/3755/2025

Case under Central Goods and Services Tax Act,2017 Section 226. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.

CNR: HCBM020293062025

Next Hearing

29th July 2026

e-Filing Number

16-09-2025

Filing Number

WP/29306/2025

Filing Date

16-09-2025

Registration No

WP/3755/2025

Registration Date

29-09-2025

Judge

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM

Coram

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM

Bench Type

Division

Category

INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )

Sub-Category

GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Central Goods and Services Tax Act,2017 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

GIA India Laboratory Private Limited LUMIERE LAW PARTNERS

Respondent(s)

The Union of India

The Additional Commissioner CGST and C Ex Audit II Mumbai

Adv. NIYATI MANKAD HAKANI,-

The Joint / Additional Commissioner CGST and C Ex Mumbai East Commissionerate

Adv. NIYATI MANKAD HAKANI,-

The Commissioner of CGST and C Ex, Mumbai East Commissionerate

Adv. NIYATI MANKAD HAKANI,-

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM

11-11-2025

FRESH ADMISSION

29-07-2026

DUE ADMISSION - 1

13-02-2026

AT 3.00 P.M.

18-02-2026

HIGH ON BOARD (HOB)

02-12-2025

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNI,HON'BLE MS JUSTICE AARTI A. SATHE

Summary: WP/3755/2025 - GIA India Laboratory Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India Case Status: Petitions referred to Larger Bench for reconsideration of conflicting judicial precedents. Core Issue: Whether consolidated (bunched) GST show-cause notices covering multiple financial years are legally permissible under Sections 73-74 of the CGST Act, 2017. Current Outcome: The Division Bench of Bombay High Court (Justices Kulkarni & Sathe) found significant legal conflicts across High Courts requiring authoritative resolution: - Milroc line (Bombay, Nagpur, Kerala, Karnataka, Madras): Consolidated notices prohibited - Delhi & Allahabad High Courts: Consolidated notices permissible - Supreme Court dismissals: Mathur Polymers (7 Nov 2025) and Ambika Traders (1 Sept 2025) - rejected petitioner challenges without interfering with Delhi HC decisions Referred Questions to Larger Bench: 1. Does limitation period in Section 73(10)/74(10) restrict issuance of consolidated notices? 2. Whether consolidated notices are statutorily prohibited? 3. Effect of Section 160 (protection of notices) on such proceedings? 4. Whether Milroc judgment states correct law? 5. Legal position under Article 141 following Supreme Court's Mathur Polymers order? Interim Status: Existing interim orders continue pending Larger Bench decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: WP/3755/2025 - GIA India Laboratory Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India Case Status: Petitions referred to Larger Bench for reconsideration of conflicting judicial precedents. Core Issue: Whether consolidated (bunched) GST show-cause notices covering multiple financial years are legally permissible under Sections 73-74 of the CGST Act, 2017. Current Outcome: The Division Bench of Bombay High Court (Justices Kulkarni & Sathe) found significant legal conflicts across High Courts requiring authoritative resolution: - Milroc line (Bombay, Nagpur, Kerala, Karnataka, Madras): Consolidated notices prohibited - Delhi & Allahabad High Courts: Consolidated notices permissible - Supreme Court dismissals: Mathur Polymers (7 Nov 2025) and Ambika Traders (1 Sept 2025) - rejected petitioner challenges without interfering with Delhi HC decisions Referred Questions to Larger Bench: 1. Does limitation period in Section 73(10)/74(10) restrict issuance of consolidated notices? 2. Whether consolidated notices are statutorily prohibited? 3. Effect of Section 160 (protection of notices) on such proceedings? 4. Whether Milroc judgment states correct law? 5. Legal position under Article 141 following Supreme Court's Mathur Polymers order? Interim Status: Existing interim orders continue pending Larger Bench decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case