GIA India Laboratory Private Limited LUMIERE LAW PARTNERS vs The Union of India — WP/3755/2025
Case under Central Goods and Services Tax Act,2017 Section 226. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM020293062025
e-Filing Number
16-09-2025
Filing Number
WP/29306/2025
Filing Date
16-Sep-2025
Registration No
WP/3755/2025
Registration Date
29-Sep-2025
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam
Bench Type
Division
Category
INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )
Sub-Category
GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GIA India Laboratory Private Limited LUMIERE LAW PARTNERS
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Union of India
-
2.The Additional Commissioner CGST and C Ex Audit II Mumbai
Adv. NIYATI MANKAD HAKANI,-
-
3.The Joint / Additional Commissioner CGST and C Ex Mumbai East Commissionerate
Adv. NIYATI MANKAD HAKANI,-
-
4.The Commissioner of CGST and C Ex, Mumbai East Commissionerate
Adv. NIYATI MANKAD HAKANI,-
Case History
-
29-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Jul-2026
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam
-
22-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Suman ShyamView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF
Summary: WP/3755/2025 - GIA India Laboratory Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India Case Status: Petitions referred to Larger Bench for reconsideration of conflicting judicial precedents. Core Issue: Whether consolidated (bunched) GST show-cause notices covering multiple financial years are legally permissible under Sections 73-74 of the CGST Act, 2017. Current Outcome: The Division Bench of Bombay High Court (Justices Kulkarni & Sathe) found significant legal conflicts across High Courts requiring authoritative resolution: - Milroc line (Bombay, Nagpur, Kerala, Karnataka, Madras): Consolidated notices prohibited - Delhi & Allahabad High Courts: Consolidated notices permissible - Supreme Court dismissals: Mathur Polymers (7 Nov 2025) and Ambika Traders (1 Sept 2025) - rejected petitioner challenges without interfering with Delhi HC decisions Referred Questions to Larger Bench: 1. Does limitation period in Section 73(10)/74(10) restrict issuance of consolidated notices? 2. Whether consolidated notices are statutorily prohibited? 3. Effect of Section 160 (protection of notices) on such proceedings? 4. Whether Milroc judgment states correct law? 5. Legal position under Article 141 following Supreme Court's Mathur Polymers order? Interim Status: Existing interim orders continue pending Larger Bench decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Feb-2026
High On Board (Hob)
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe
-
13-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF
-
13-Feb-2026
At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe
-
12-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF
-
02-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna,hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. SonakView PDF
-
02-Dec-2025
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna , Hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. Sonak
-
11-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna,hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. SonakView PDF
-
11-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/3755/2025
Summary: WP/3755/2025 - GIA India Laboratory Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India Case Status: Petitions referred to Larger Bench for reconsideration of conflicting judicial precedents. Core Issue: Whether consolidated (bunched) GST show-cause notices covering multiple financial years are legally permissible under Sections 73-74 of the CGST Act, 2017. Current Outcome: The Division Bench of Bombay High Court (Justices Kulkarni & Sathe) found significant legal conflicts across High Courts requiring authoritative resolution: - Milroc line (Bombay, Nagpur, Kerala, Karnataka, Madras): Consolidated notices prohibited - Delhi & Allahabad High Courts: Consolidated notices permissible - Supreme Court dismissals: Mathur Polymers (7 Nov 2025) and Ambika Traders (1 Sept 2025) - rejected petitioner challenges without interfering with Delhi HC decisions Referred Questions to Larger Bench: 1. Does limitation period in Section 73(10)/74(10) restrict issuance of consolidated notices? 2. Whether consolidated notices are statutorily prohibited? 3. Effect of Section 160 (protection of notices) on such proceedings? 4. Whether Milroc judgment states correct law? 5. Legal position under Article 141 following Supreme Court's Mathur Polymers order? Interim Status: Existing interim orders continue pending Larger Bench decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts