RAJESH SHIVRAM KERKAR vs MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MHADA) — WP/1713/2025
Case under Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 226. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020289622024
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/28955/2024
Filing Date
20-09-2024
Registration No
WP/1713/2025
Registration Date
07-05-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Bench Type
Division
Category
TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )
Sub-Category
MHADA ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJESH SHIVRAM KERKAR
Adv. Jeetendra Ranawat
Respondent(s)
MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MHADA)
MUMBAI HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD (MHADA)
MUMBAI BUILDING REPAIRS AND RECONSTRUCTION BOARD (MBRRB/MBR AND R BOARD)
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-03-2025 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 06-01-2025 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 20-01-2025 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 18-03-2025 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 24-04-2025 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
Summary: The Bombay High Court ordered that petitioner Rajesh Kerkar be allotted a 380 sq. feet flat (instead of the originally promised 300 sq. feet) without paying the additional Rs. 16 lacs demanded by MHADA for the extra 80 sq. feet, finding prima facie that he cannot be forced to pay this amount given his financial constraints. The respondents were granted 3 weeks to file an affidavit-in-reply, and the petition was adjourned to 12 June 2026 for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Bombay High Court ordered that petitioner Rajesh Kerkar be allotted a 380 sq. feet flat (instead of the originally promised 300 sq. feet) without paying the additional Rs. 16 lacs demanded by MHADA for the extra 80 sq. feet, finding prima facie that he cannot be forced to pay this amount given his financial constraints. The respondents were granted 3 weeks to file an affidavit-in-reply, and the petition was adjourned to 12 June 2026 for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts