Auxilo Finserve Pvt Ltd Tikshta Modi vs Komal Rani — EXA/2379/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure (Maharashtra Amendment) Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM020288032025

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

11-09-2025

Filing Number

EXA/28803/2025

Filing Date

12-09-2025

Registration No

EXA/2379/2025

Registration Date

31-10-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

08th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure (Maharashtra Amendment) Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

Auxilo Finserve Pvt Ltd Tikshta Modi

Respondent(s)

Komal Rani

Pawan Kumar

Parvinder Kaur

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

08-06-2026

For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

Orders

08-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in consolidated matters (Serial Nos. 902-925) involving Auxilo Finserve Pvt Ltd and others, finding that the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, which is void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. All related execution and interim applications were dismissed, with parties permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings while excluding the prior arbitration period from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in consolidated matters (Serial Nos. 902-925) involving Auxilo Finserve Pvt Ltd and others, finding that the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, which is void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. All related execution and interim applications were dismissed, with parties permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings while excluding the prior arbitration period from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case