AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED vs MOHAMMED HAIDER MALIK S/O JAMEEL AHMED — EXA/144/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020283352023

Filing Number

EXA/28326/2023

Filing Date

10-Oct-2023

Registration No

EXA/144/2024

Registration Date

31-Jan-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED

    Adv. D V NAWADKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMED HAIDER MALIK S/O JAMEEL AHMED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications and set aside arbitral awards where the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, following the Supreme Court's ruling in *Bhadra International* that such appointments are void ab initio. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the time period already spent in the void arbitration from the limitation period for filing new proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 10-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/144/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications and set aside arbitral awards where the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, following the Supreme Court's ruling in *Bhadra International* that such appointments are void ab initio. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the time period already spent in the void arbitration from the limitation period for filing new proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case