M/S CITI FINANCIAL CONSUMER FINANCE INDIA LTD. (FORMERLY ASSOCIATES INDIA FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.) M. B. KALE , S.M. SURYAWANSHI, ONKAR GUJAR vs MR. NISHIT JAGDISHBHAI PATEL AND ORS. — EXA/1374/2011

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020282892011

Filing Number

EXA/2024/2011

Filing Date

13-Dec-2011

Registration No

EXA/1374/2011

Registration Date

23-Dec-2011

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S CITI FINANCIAL CONSUMER FINANCE INDIA LTD. (FORMERLY ASSOCIATES INDIA FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.) M. B. KALE , S.M. SURYAWANSHI, ONKAR GUJAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MR. NISHIT JAGDISHBHAI PATEL AND ORS.

  2. 2.MS SARIKA NISHIT PATEL

  3. 3.MR. JAGDISHBHAI MAGANBHAI PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Case Summary: EXA/1374/2011 The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards after finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, which is void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, but permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previous time period excluded for limitation purposes, unless express written waiver existed under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 13-Dec-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1374/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: EXA/1374/2011 The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards after finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, which is void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, but permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previous time period excluded for limitation purposes, unless express written waiver existed under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case