TRIDOSS LABORATORIES PVT. LTD. AND ANR vs UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS Advocate - GP OS, RESP. NO. 1,RESPONDENT NO. 2 AND 3,D P SINGH — WP/2789/2017

Case under Essential Commodities Act. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 22-Nov-2017

CNR: HCBM020282672017

Filing Number

WP/3250/2017

Filing Date

20-Nov-2017

Registration No

WP/2789/2017

Registration Date

22-Nov-2017

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Essential Commodities Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TRIDOSS LABORATORIES PVT. LTD. AND ANR

    Adv. VM LEGAL

  2. 2.AKHTAR SHAMSI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS Advocate - GP OS, RESP. NO. 1,RESPONDENT NO. 2 AND 3,D P SINGH

  2. 2.THE COLLECTOR MUMBAI CITY

  3. 3.THE TAHSILDAR (GOVT. DUES RECOVERY)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court quashed demand notices issued by the Union of India (Department of Pharmaceuticals) against Tridoss Laboratories for alleged overcharging of a pharmaceutical product (Phylobid CR 300 mg), citing gross delay of over 10 years in initiating proceedings and violation of natural justice principles. The court found the government's action unsustainable as it prevented the company from defending itself due to unavailable records and failed to properly consider the company's defense that the specific drug formulation was never subject to price controls. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    High On Board -

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    At 01.00 Pm

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    Bottom Of The Board

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  9. 04-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  10. 04-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  11. 09-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  12. 10-Sep-2020

    For Admission

    According To Sitting List

  13. 11-Jul-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. GadkariView PDF

  14. 11-Jul-2018

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Anuja Prabhudessai , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjit More.

  15. 06-Jun-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. GadkariView PDF

  16. 06-Jun-2018

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Anuja Prabhudessai , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjit More.

  17. 11-Apr-2018

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice S.S. Jadhav , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjit More.

  18. 22-Dec-2017

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh G. Ketkar,hon'ble Shri Justice Shantanu S. KemkarView PDF

  19. 22-Dec-2017

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh G. Ketkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shantanu S. Kemkar

  20. 22-Nov-2017

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Shri Justice Shantanu S. KemkarView PDF

  21. 22-Nov-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 20-Nov-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2789/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court quashed demand notices issued by the Union of India (Department of Pharmaceuticals) against Tridoss Laboratories for alleged overcharging of a pharmaceutical product (Phylobid CR 300 mg), citing gross delay of over 10 years in initiating proceedings and violation of natural justice principles. The court found the government's action unsustainable as it prevented the company from defending itself due to unavailable records and failed to properly consider the company's defense that the specific drug formulation was never subject to price controls. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case