MAHENDRA D. TURAKHIA vs JAIN INTERNATIONAL TRADE ORGANIZATION AND 52 ORS. Advocate - kookada and associates, CONTMNOR NO. 1,F. F. AND ASSOCIATES,RES. NO. 49,Mittal Munoth — CONPW/121/2014

Case under Companies Act & Rules 1956. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Dec-2014

CNR: HCBM020279982014

Filing Number

CONPW/134/2014

Filing Date

04-Dec-2014

Registration No

CONPW/121/2014

Registration Date

15-Dec-2014

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 06-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Companies Act & Rules 1956

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHENDRA D. TURAKHIA

    Adv. AMI OZA,PETITIONER,PETITIONER, PETITIONER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAIN INTERNATIONAL TRADE ORGANIZATION AND 52 ORS. Advocate - kookada and associates, CONTMNOR NO. 1,F. F. AND ASSOCIATES,RES. NO. 49,Mittal Munoth

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 1885 of 2016 filed by Mahendra D. Turakhia against the Registrar of Companies and others for want of prosecution, as the petitioner failed to appear or be represented by counsel despite multiple hearings. Consequently, the related Contempt Petition No. 121 of 2014 was also dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  8. 06-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  9. 21-Jan-2020

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal,hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. TatedView PDF

  10. 16-Dec-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal,hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. TatedView PDF

  11. 11-Nov-2019

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal , Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. Tated

  12. 01-Oct-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prakash D. Naik,hon'ble Shri Justice A.A. SayedView PDF

  13. 21-Sep-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal,hon'ble Shri Justice Shantanu S. KemkarView PDF

  14. 30-Aug-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice B.R. GavaiView PDF

  15. 22-Apr-2015

    For Admission - Fresh (High On Board) [Original Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Shri Justice B.R. Gavai

  16. 27-Mar-2015

    For Admission - Fresh (High On Board) [Original Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Shri Justice B.R. Gavai

  17. 20-Feb-2015

    For Admission - Fresh (High On Board) [Original Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.R. Joshi , Hon'ble Shri Justice V.M. Kanade

  18. 22-Dec-2014

    For Admission - Fresh (High On Board) [Original Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere , Hon'ble Shri Justice V.M. Kanade

  19. 18-Dec-2014

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 04-Dec-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. CONPW/121/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 1885 of 2016 filed by Mahendra D. Turakhia against the Registrar of Companies and others for want of prosecution, as the petitioner failed to appear or be represented by counsel despite multiple hearings. Consequently, the related Contempt Petition No. 121 of 2014 was also dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case