PROCTER AND GAMBLE HYGIENE AND HEALTH CARE LIMITED vs JAY DAWANI — LPETN/156/2026
Case under Copyright Act Section 62. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020276372025
e-Filing Number
04-09-2025
Filing Number
LPETN/27637/2025
Filing Date
08-09-2025
Registration No
LPETN/156/2026
Registration Date
27-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH
Bench Type
Single
Category
MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )
Sub-Category
TRADE MARKS ( 20 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PROCTER AND GAMBLE HYGIENE AND HEALTH CARE LIMITED
Adv. Rashmi Singh
THE PROCTER AND GAMBLE COMPANY
Adv. RASHMI SINGH
Respondent(s)
JAY DAWANI
BHISHAM LAL DAWANI
MANISH DAWANI
MAYANK DAWANI
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH
FOR CIRCULATION
DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS
DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-10-2025 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 17-12-2025 | DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS |
| 27-01-2026 | DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS |
Orders
The Bombay High Court's Commercial Division decreed the IP suit filed by Procter and Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Limited against Jay Dawani and others on 17th April 2026, following an amicable settlement between parties. The court accepted the Consent Terms signed by both parties and granted a decree in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (c) and (e) of the plaint, with court fees to be refunded and the Court Receiver discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court's Commercial Division decreed the IP suit filed by Procter and Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Limited against Jay Dawani and others on 17th April 2026, following an amicable settlement between parties. The court accepted the Consent Terms signed by both parties and granted a decree in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (c) and (e) of the plaint, with court fees to be refunded and the Court Receiver discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts