BABU IMAM SHAIKH A.K.PRAJAPATI vs EXECUTIVE ENGINEER SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY(SRA) AND 3 ORS — WP/574/2017

Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM020276122016

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

13th June 2017

Filing Number

WP/2961/2016

Filing Date

27-10-2016

Registration No

WP/574/2017

Registration Date

09-03-2017

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

BABU IMAM SHAIKH A.K.PRAJAPATI

Respondent(s)

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY(SRA) AND 3 ORS

MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

ASST MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER

M/S SWEET ANGLE HOME BUILDERS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

13-06-2017

FOR ADMISSION - FRESH

13-10-2020

FOR ADMISSION

18-04-2019

FOR ADMISSION - FRESH

05-01-2018

FOR ADMISSION - FRESH

Orders

10-01-2017
17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

The Bombay High Court disposed of the 2017 writ petition due to the petitioner's non-appearance, without addressing the substantive merits. The court permitted the petitioner to file a fresh representation to the Executive Engineer, SRA, regarding the cause of action, with a direction that the respondent consider it expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of the 2017 writ petition due to the petitioner's non-appearance, without addressing the substantive merits. The court permitted the petitioner to file a fresh representation to the Executive Engineer, SRA, regarding the cause of action, with a direction that the respondent consider it expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case