PRAVESH ASHOK JHAVERI vs SUSHILA SHRIDHAR MURTHY — TP/355/2026
Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 278. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th February 2026.
CNR: HCBM020275392025
e-Filing Number
25-08-2025
Filing Number
TP/27539/2025
Filing Date
04-Sep-2025
Registration No
TP/355/2026
Registration Date
21-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
Bench Type
Single
Category
TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )
Sub-Category
Letters of Administration without Will ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
06-Feb-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 24-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRAVESH ASHOK JHAVERI
Adv. PRIYANSHU SANTOSH MISHRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUSHILA SHRIDHAR MURTHY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
The Bombay High Court allowed the petitioner's request to use a xerox copy of the certified petition in place of the lost original, after the advocate inadvertently lost the certified copy received after online filing. The court permitted amendments to proceed on the xerox copy, dispensed with reverification, and treated the xerox as the original document to be preserved by the advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
06-Feb-2026
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF
-
06-Feb-2026
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF
-
06-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
06-Feb-2026
For Direction
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
-
22-Jan-2026
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF
-
22-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
04-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. TP/355/2026
The Bombay High Court allowed the petitioner's request to use a xerox copy of the certified petition in place of the lost original, after the advocate inadvertently lost the certified copy received after online filing. The court permitted amendments to proceed on the xerox copy, dispensed with reverification, and treated the xerox as the original document to be preserved by the advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts