MOHAMMED SUHAIL QURESHI AND ORS vs SAYEED AHMED HABIB QURESHI AND ORS. — IA/7624/2025

Case under Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 226. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.

Next hearing 22-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM020274252025

Filing Number

IA/27425/2025

Filing Date

04-Sep-2025

Registration No

IA/7624/2025

Registration Date

04-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

Bench Type

Division

Category

TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )

Sub-Category

MHADA ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMED SUHAIL QURESHI AND ORS

    Adv. M/S. JHANGIANI NARULA and ASSOCIATES

  2. 2.MEHMOOD YAKUB SYED

  3. 3.ABDUL KAYUM QURESHI

  4. 4.ASMATBI AMIR KHAN

  5. 5.MOHAMMED AYUB QURESHI

  6. 6.JAVERIA SAYEED AHMED QURESHI

  7. 7.NAZIYA SAYEED AHMED QURESHI

  8. 8.AQUATIC WORLD

  9. 9.RIZWAN A. K. QURESHI

  10. 10.ALVIA AHMED SAYED

  11. 11.FARHEEN AHMED, LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED YASMIN ABANI

  12. 12.REHANA MEHMOOD SAYEED

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAYEED AHMED HABIB QURESHI AND ORS.

  2. 2.JUNAID SAYEED AHMED QURESHI

  3. 3.SUFYAN A. K. QURESHI

  4. 4.SUFIYA A. K. QURESHI

  5. 5.ABDUL SALAAM A. K. QURESHI

  6. 6.ABDUR REHMAN A. K. QURESHI

  7. 7.MEHMOODA A. K. QURESHI

  8. 8.RAEES AHMED A. K. QURESHI

  9. 9.IRFAN A. K. QURESHI

  10. 10.SHAKEEL AHMED A. K. QURESHI

  11. 11.SHENAZ AHMED SAYED, W/O SAYED AHMED SAYED GULAM, LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED SAYED AHMED SAYED GULAM

  12. 12.HAMZA AHMED SAYED, LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED SAYED AHMED SAYED GULAM

  13. 13.ZOHEB AHMED SAYED, LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED SAYED AHMED SAYED GULAM

  14. 14.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI, THROUGH ITS MUNICPAL COMMISSIONER

  15. 15.MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, THROUGH ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  16. 16.ABDUL RAZZAK HAJI

  17. 17.FARID HUSAIN AHMED SOLANKI

  18. 18.MOHAMMAD YUNUS AHMEDNOOR ATTARWALA

  19. 19.SUNITA SATISH PALVEKAR, LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED SHIVRAM SHYAMRAO MORE

  20. 20.SHAHI KUTHE, LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED SHIVRAM SHYAMRAO MORE

  21. 21.SANGEETA MORE, LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED SHIVRAM SHYAMRAO MORE

  22. 22.HAFIZ KHAN KARIM KHAN

  23. 23.KANEEZ FATIMA ABDUL KADIR

  24. 24.MUFIZ ABDUL AZIZ

  25. 25.ISMAIL ABDUL RAZAK HAJI

  26. 26.RAZIYA HAJI ISMAIL

  27. 27.ISMAIL ABDUL RAZAK

  28. 28.MEHNAAZ AHMED SAYED, LEGAL HEIR OF DECEASED SAYED AHMED SAYED GULAM

  29. 29.OOVES ABANI, LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED YASMIN ABANI

Case History

  1. 22-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF

    Summary: In Interim Application No. 7624 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court, the case was adjourned. Notice was issued to Respondent No. 4, returnable on 22nd April 2026, with private notice permitted. The court found prima facie substance in the applicants' submissions and directed applicants to serve other respondents by private notice as well. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

  5. 19-Nov-2025

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe

  6. 12-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF

  7. 12-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 04-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/7624/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Interim Application No. 7624 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court, the case was adjourned. Notice was issued to Respondent No. 4, returnable on 22nd April 2026, with private notice permitted. The court found prima facie substance in the applicants' submissions and directed applicants to serve other respondents by private notice as well. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case