SAI DARSHAN SRA CO-OP. HSG. SOCIETY LTD., -, -,SANTOSH SITAP vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND 9 ORS. — WP/56/2022
Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.
CNR: HCBM020273202021
Filing Number
WP/27237/2021
Filing Date
24-Nov-2021
Registration No
WP/56/2022
Registration Date
05-Jan-2022
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Bench Type
Division
Category
SLUM AREAS ( 49 )
Sub-Category
Slum areas ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAI DARSHAN SRA CO-OP. HSG. SOCIETY LTD., -, -,SANTOSH SITAP
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND 9 ORS.
-
2.THE SUBURBAN DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
-
3.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY,
Adv. MISS APARNA D VHATKAR
-
4.VEETRAG HOLDING CO. PVT. LTD.,
-
5.MYHTILI PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.,
-
6.DARSHAN DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.
Adv. ADV BHARATI NEGI
-
7.IMMEDIATE PATEL ESTATES PVT. LTD.,
Adv. ADV BHARATI NEGI
-
8.GHARDWAR REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD.,
Adv. ADV BHARATI NEGI
-
9.VYOMAKARA REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD.,
Adv. ADV BHARATI NEGI
-
10.SUVARAT REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD.
Adv. ADV BHARATI NEGI
Case History
-
22-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Jul-2026
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
Case Summary: WP 56/2022 was adjourned to 22 July 2026. The court directed respondents 6-10 to file affidavits-in-reply within three weeks, and permitted the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) to file its affidavit-in-reply within the same period. No substantive order on the merits was issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Nov-2021
Case filed
Registration No. WP/56/2022
Case Summary: WP 56/2022 was adjourned to 22 July 2026. The court directed respondents 6-10 to file affidavits-in-reply within three weeks, and permitted the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) to file its affidavit-in-reply within the same period. No substantive order on the merits was issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts