SBI CARDS AND PAYMENT SERVICES LIMITED ACUMEN LAWYERS FIRM vs MOHAN KUMAR SWAMI — EXA/2604/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020272842023
Filing Number
EXA/27274/2023
Filing Date
03-Oct-2023
Registration No
EXA/2604/2024
Registration Date
20-Sep-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 07-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SBI CARDS AND PAYMENT SERVICES LIMITED ACUMEN LAWYERS FIRM
Respondent(s)
-
1.MOHAN KUMAR SWAMI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 consolidated applications (Serial Nos. 32-221) after finding that sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally in all cases. Following the Supreme Court's decision in *Bhadra International v. Airports Authority of India*, which held that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio, the court set aside all arbitral awards and dismissed related Commercial Execution Applications. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded from calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
03-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. EXA/2604/2024
Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 consolidated applications (Serial Nos. 32-221) after finding that sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally in all cases. Following the Supreme Court's decision in *Bhadra International v. Airports Authority of India*, which held that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio, the court set aside all arbitral awards and dismissed related Commercial Execution Applications. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded from calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts