Auxilo Finserve Private limited Tikshta Modi vs Neha Singh — EXA/2404/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure (Maharashtra Amendment) Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM020271362025

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

26-08-2025

Filing Number

EXA/27135/2025

Filing Date

03-09-2025

Registration No

EXA/2404/2025

Registration Date

04-11-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

08th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure (Maharashtra Amendment) Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

Auxilo Finserve Private limited Tikshta Modi

Respondent(s)

Neha Singh

Udham Sangwan

Baljinder Singh Sangwan

Kiran Sangwan

Saroj Balal

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

08-06-2026

For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

Orders

08-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple matters (serial nos. 902-925) after finding the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, applying Supreme Court precedent that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all execution applications and interim applications, but permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the time period of the previous arbitration excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple matters (serial nos. 902-925) after finding the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, applying Supreme Court precedent that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all execution applications and interim applications, but permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the time period of the previous arbitration excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case