MARIA SELVAN NADAR OF MUMBAI vs HOMI JAL CHIBAR — S/316/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020270622025
Filing Number
S/27062/2025
Filing Date
02-Sep-2025
Registration No
S/316/2025
Registration Date
28-Oct-2025
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Single
Category
LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 21 )
Sub-Category
POSESSION ON ANY OTHER GROUND ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MARIA SELVAN NADAR OF MUMBAI
Adv. Jagdish S HEGDE
Respondent(s)
-
1.HOMI JAL CHIBAR
-
2.PERSI JAL CHIBAR
-
3.DIAS JAL CHIDAR
-
4.BURJOR RUSTOM JOSHI
-
5.SHIRIN R ANTIA
-
6.RAYOMAND BURZOR JOSHI
-
7.MEHERWAN BURZOR JOSHI
-
8.ZARIR RUSTOM JOSHI
-
9.FRAMROZE RUSTOM JOSHI
-
10.VEERA FRAMROZE JOSHI
-
11.ZUBIN FRAMROZE JOSHI
-
12.PERCY FRAMROZE JOSHI
-
13.MARGARET DARA JOSHI
-
14.BURJOR DARA JOSHI
-
15.BAKHTAWAR DARA JOSHI
-
16.DEPUTY COLLECTOR MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MMRDA)
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
Summary: In suit S/316/2025, the court accepted that defendants 1-12 and 14-16 were served with writs of summons on 06.01.2026, and that defendant 13 has expired with defendants 14-15 being the legal heirs. Since the defendants failed to file written statements within the stipulated time, the suit against them was transferred to the list of Undefended Suits. The plaintiff's advocate was directed to file an Affidavit of Service in the department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
For Direction
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
-
02-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. S/316/2025
Summary: In suit S/316/2025, the court accepted that defendants 1-12 and 14-16 were served with writs of summons on 06.01.2026, and that defendant 13 has expired with defendants 14-15 being the legal heirs. Since the defendants failed to file written statements within the stipulated time, the suit against them was transferred to the list of Undefended Suits. The plaintiff's advocate was directed to file an Affidavit of Service in the department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts