RICHARDSON AND CRUDDAS ( vs MRUNAL BHAGAT AND 3 ORS. Advocate - Pradeep J Thorat, DEFENDANT NO.2.,Pradeep J Thorat,DEF.NO.1,Dua Associates AOR,DEFE. NO. 4,Dua Associates AOR,DEFE. NO 5 TO 8,NITIN MULYE ( — S/3572/2006

Case under Advocates Act 1961. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

CNR: HCBM020270622006

Next Hearing

23rd June 2026

Filing Number

S/3526/2006

Filing Date

13-12-2006

Registration No

S/3572/2006

Registration Date

20-12-2006

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Advocates Act 1961

Petitioner(s)

RICHARDSON AND CRUDDAS (

LTD. M/S PURNANAND AND COMPANY

Respondent(s)

MRUNAL BHAGAT AND 3 ORS. Advocate - Pradeep J Thorat, DEFENDANT NO.2.,Pradeep J Thorat,DEF.NO.1,Dua Associates AOR,DEFE. NO. 4,Dua Associates AOR,DEFE. NO 5 TO 8,NITIN MULYE (

PALLAVI BHAGAT

AVANISH BHAGAT

PHARMA

LEGEND PHARMACEUTICALS PVT.LTD

GODAVARI FARMS PRIVATE LIMITED,

VIKRAM DIGVIJAY KAPADIA,

HANSA DIGVIJAY KAPADIA

Hearing History

11-03-2008

FOR DIRECTIONS

23-06-2026

FOR MARKING OF DOCUMENTS

23-04-2026

FOR MARKING OF DOCUMENTS

04-03-2026

FOR MARKING OF DOCUMENTS

27-01-2026

DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS

Orders

23-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

Case Summary: Richardson and Cruddas Ltd. v. Mrunal Bhagat (S/3572/2006) Outcome: Case adjourned to 23rd June 2026. The court granted the defendants' request for time to file a Statement of admission and denial following the plaintiff's filing of an additional Affidavit of documents. The plaintiff's witness was not present; the court directed the plaintiff's witness to appear on the next date and both parties to file their respective pleadings by then. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Richardson and Cruddas Ltd. v. Mrunal Bhagat (S/3572/2006) Outcome: Case adjourned to 23rd June 2026. The court granted the defendants' request for time to file a Statement of admission and denial following the plaintiff's filing of an additional Affidavit of documents. The plaintiff's witness was not present; the court directed the plaintiff's witness to appear on the next date and both parties to file their respective pleadings by then. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case