L AND T FINANCE LIMITED vs MR. SATISH DEDHIA AND ANR. — EXA/2326/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020270152015

Filing Number

EXA/2054/2015

Filing Date

30-Sep-2015

Registration No

EXA/2326/2015

Registration Date

30-Oct-2015

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.L AND T FINANCE LIMITED

    Adv. S. I. Joshi and Co.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MR. SATISH DEDHIA AND ANR.

  2. 2.MR. PREMJI DEDHIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral awards in L&T Finance Limited's execution application against Satish Dedhia, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed the execution applications and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded from calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

  4. 30-Sep-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2326/2015

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral awards in L&T Finance Limited's execution application against Satish Dedhia, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed the execution applications and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded from calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case