SUNDARAM FINANCE LIMITED NARAYAN R. AWATE vs RAJESH RAM ABHILASH PANDEY — EXA/25/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020268832025

Filing Number

EXA/26882/2025

Filing Date

26-Aug-2025

Registration No

EXA/25/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNDARAM FINANCE LIMITED NARAYAN R. AWATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH RAM ABHILASH PANDEY

  2. 2.MUKESH KUMAR PANDEY

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Bombay dismissed all applications (Serial Nos. 902-1169) and set aside the respective arbitral awards, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and void ab initio, following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International. Parties are permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the limitation period excluded, except where express written agreements waive the ineligibility objection under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 26-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/25/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Bombay dismissed all applications (Serial Nos. 902-1169) and set aside the respective arbitral awards, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and void ab initio, following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International. Parties are permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the limitation period excluded, except where express written agreements waive the ineligibility objection under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case