PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 3 MUMBAI vs SICOM LTD AY 2013 14 ITA 2036MUM2023 — HCBM20265362024

Case under Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

Next hearing 09-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM020265362024

e-Filing Number

25-08-2024

Filing Number

ITXA/26529/2024

Filing Date

26-Aug-2024

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 3 MUMBAI

    Adv. Adv vipul Bajpayee

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SICOM LTD AY 2013 14 ITA 2036MUM2023

Case History

  1. 09-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF

    Summary: In Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 26529/2024 before the Bombay High Court, the appellant is directed to remove office objections and register/number the appeal by filing a compliance praecipe within two weeks from the outcome of the pending condonation of delay application. The appeal will be rejected for non-compliance with office objections under O.S. Rule 986 if the appellant fails to comply within the stipulated timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    I/C Registrar(os)/Prothonotary And Sr. MasterView PDF

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    For Rejection Under Rule 986

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  6. 26-Aug-2024

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 26529/2024 before the Bombay High Court, the appellant is directed to remove office objections and register/number the appeal by filing a compliance praecipe within two weeks from the outcome of the pending condonation of delay application. The appeal will be rejected for non-compliance with office objections under O.S. Rule 986 if the appellant fails to comply within the stipulated timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case