SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO. LTD (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE LIMITED) vs KAMARUZZAMA NAIMULLAH ANSARI — EXA/2662/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020264802023

Filing Number

EXA/26472/2023

Filing Date

25-Sep-2023

Registration No

EXA/2662/2024

Registration Date

30-Sep-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO. LTD (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE LIMITED)

    Adv. Disha Karambar and Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAMARUZZAMA NAIMULLAH ANSARI

  2. 2.ISTEKHAR KHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications involving unilateral arbitrator appointments, following the Supreme Court's landmark decision in *Bhadra International* which held that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio and ineligibility can be raised at any stage. The Court set aside all arbitral awards and commercial execution applications, but permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previous time period excluded from limitation calculations, unless there is a written agreement waiving such objections under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Nov-2025

    For Direction

    Mrs.Maheshwari Parkar, Taxing Master

  4. 03-Nov-2025

    Mrs.Maheshwari Parkar, Taxing MasterView PDF

  5. 13-Oct-2025

    Mrs.Maheshwari Parkar, Taxing MasterView PDF

  6. 06-Oct-2025

    Mrs.Maheshwari Parkar, Taxing MasterView PDF

  7. 06-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 25-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2662/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications involving unilateral arbitrator appointments, following the Supreme Court's landmark decision in *Bhadra International* which held that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio and ineligibility can be raised at any stage. The Court set aside all arbitral awards and commercial execution applications, but permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previous time period excluded from limitation calculations, unless there is a written agreement waiving such objections under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case