SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED) vs NANESHWAR HIRAPPA GAWADA — EXA/376/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020263532023

Filing Number

EXA/26345/2023

Filing Date

21-Sep-2023

Registration No

EXA/376/2024

Registration Date

09-Feb-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED)

    Adv. Santosh Maske

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NANESHWAR HIRAPPA GAWADA

  2. 2.RAGHAVENDRA LAKSHMANA NANJEGOWDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple commercial arbitration applications (Serial Nos. 901, 903, 904, 916-1148) and set aside all arbitral awards because the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, which is void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent (Bhadra International v. Airports Authority of India). The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 21-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/376/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple commercial arbitration applications (Serial Nos. 901, 903, 904, 916-1148) and set aside all arbitral awards because the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, which is void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent (Bhadra International v. Airports Authority of India). The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case