AADIL NOOR MOHAMMAD FRUITWALA AND 2 ORS vs JUZAR MUSTANSIR ANGOOTHIWALA AND ANR — S/397/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020263402021

Filing Number

S/26257/2021

Filing Date

11-Nov-2021

Registration No

S/397/2025

Registration Date

29-Dec-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Single

Category

SUITS ( 38 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AADIL NOOR MOHAMMAD FRUITWALA AND 2 ORS

    Adv. KOOKADA and ASSOCIATES,Rajendra Rathod,Rajendra Rathod, ,Rajendra Rathod

  2. 2.AAKIL NOOR MOHAMMAD FRUITWALA @ BABU

    Adv. Rajendra Rathod

  3. 3.AAMIL NOOR MOHAMMAD FRUITWALA

    Adv. Rajendra Rathod

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JUZAR MUSTANSIR ANGOOTHIWALA AND ANR

  2. 2.EIMAARA PROPERTIES VENTURE

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

    Case Summary: S/397/2025 The court directed the plaintiffs (Aadil Noor Mohammad Fruitwala and others) to serve the defendants with a Writ of Summons and file an affidavit of service by the next date, with a warning that failure to comply would result in dismissal under O.S.Rule 87. The plaintiffs were granted liberty to serve defendants through all modes including service upon their advocates, and the case was adjourned to 30.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Direction

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  4. 18-Jul-2023

    Shri. S. B. Bhansali (Prothonotary Senior Master))View PDF

  5. 18-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Nov-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. S/397/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S/397/2025 The court directed the plaintiffs (Aadil Noor Mohammad Fruitwala and others) to serve the defendants with a Writ of Summons and file an affidavit of service by the next date, with a warning that failure to comply would result in dismissal under O.S.Rule 87. The plaintiffs were granted liberty to serve defendants through all modes including service upon their advocates, and the case was adjourned to 30.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case