HARSHUL RAI vs ANNABEL DRAGAN Advocate - Anasamah Sayed, - — S/307/2025
Case under Information Technology Act Section 1. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020262882025
Filing Number
S/26288/2025
Filing Date
21-Aug-2025
Registration No
S/307/2025
Registration Date
15-Oct-2025
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Single
Category
SUITS ( 38 )
Sub-Category
OTHER ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 10-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARSHUL RAI
Adv. Abhishek Adke
-
2.VAIBHAV RAI
-
3.DR. SAVITA RAI
-
4.HARSHITA KHETAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.ANNABEL DRAGAN Advocate - Anasamah Sayed, -
-
2.META PLATFORMS INC
Adv. Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas and Co,SHARDUL AMARCHAND MANGALDAS AND CO
-
3.ASHOK KUMAR
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
09-Apr-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
In case S/307/2025, the suit against Defendant No. 1 has been transferred to the list of Long Causes after the defendant filed a Written Statement on 16.10.2025. The suit against Defendant No. 2 has been transferred to the list of Undefended Suits as the defendant failed to file a Written Statement within the stipulated time despite being served. Defendant No. 3 (identified as John Doe) was noted in the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
For Direction
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
-
03-Oct-2025
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
-
03-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. S/307/2025
In case S/307/2025, the suit against Defendant No. 1 has been transferred to the list of Long Causes after the defendant filed a Written Statement on 16.10.2025. The suit against Defendant No. 2 has been transferred to the list of Undefended Suits as the defendant failed to file a Written Statement within the stipulated time despite being served. Defendant No. 3 (identified as John Doe) was noted in the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts