PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 42 MUMBAI vs Chetan V Mehta — HCBM20262502024
Case under Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020262502024
e-Filing Number
22-08-2024
Filing Number
ITXA/26243/2024
Filing Date
22-Aug-2024
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 10-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 42 MUMBAI
Adv. Sushma Nagaraj
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chetan V Mehta
Case History
-
09-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF
Summary: In Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 26243/2024, the Bombay High Court directed the appellant to remove office objections and register/number the appeal by filing a compliance praecipe within two weeks from the outcome of the pending condonation of delay application. The appeal will stand rejected for non-compliance if the appellant fails to fulfill these requirements under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
I/C Registrar(os)/Prothonotary And Sr. MasterView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
For Rejection Under Rule 986
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
-
22-Aug-2024
Case filed
Summary: In Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 26243/2024, the Bombay High Court directed the appellant to remove office objections and register/number the appeal by filing a compliance praecipe within two weeks from the outcome of the pending condonation of delay application. The appeal will stand rejected for non-compliance if the appellant fails to fulfill these requirements under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts