ANDREW MICHEL FERNANDES vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND TOWN PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND 4 ORS — IA/2425/2026
Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 23rd April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020260582025
Filing Number
IA/26056/2025
Filing Date
18-08-2025
Registration No
IA/2425/2026
Registration Date
29-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANDREW MICHEL FERNANDES
Adv. D V SAROJ
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND TOWN PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND 4 ORS
SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY, THROUGH ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER
MEENATAI THAKARE, THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN/SECRETARY
JANKI DEVELOPERS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
Case Summary: Andrew Michel Fernandes v. State of Maharashtra The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition, finding that the petitioner has an adequate alternative remedy. The Deputy Collector, SRA had passed an order (30.07.2025) directing handover of premises to the SRA Manager. The court held the petitioner can challenge this order by filing an appeal under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 before the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) within two weeks, with SRA not objecting to limitation issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Andrew Michel Fernandes v. State of Maharashtra The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition, finding that the petitioner has an adequate alternative remedy. The Deputy Collector, SRA had passed an order (30.07.2025) directing handover of premises to the SRA Manager. The court held the petitioner can challenge this order by filing an appeal under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 before the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) within two weeks, with SRA not objecting to limitation issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts