CHETAN RAMA RUPASARI DHODIA vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH COLLECTOR MUMBAI SUBURBAN — WP/452/2026
Case under Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966 Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 29th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020260122025
Filing Number
WP/26010/2025
Filing Date
18-08-2025
Registration No
WP/452/2026
Registration Date
20-01-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Bench Type
Division
Category
LAND REVENUE CODE MATTERS ( 57 )
Sub-Category
Division Bench ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHETAN RAMA RUPASARI DHODIA
Adv. C K Tripathi
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH COLLECTOR MUMBAI SUBURBAN
THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI, THROUGH MUMBAI MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY
THE COURT RECEIVER, APPOINTED BY HIGH COURT BOMBAY IN SUIT NO 3415/
DHARENDRA PADMAVATI DEVELOPERS, THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR/PARTNERS DHARENDRA NALIN LAXMICHAND SHAH
ARJUN ANANT WAGHMARE, PROPRIETOR OF SUNIL CONSTRUCTION
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
-ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
-DUE ADMISSION
-ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-01-2026 | -ADMISSION |
| 29-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 15-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 06-03-2026 | -DUE ADMISSION |
| 18-02-2026 | -ADMISSION |
Orders
The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition after the state's counsel informed the court that the Sub-Divisional officer had issued a decision on April 16, 2026, and undertook to communicate it to the petitioner if not already done. The court directed the petitioner to review the decision and pursue appropriate legal remedies thereafter, while keeping all contentions open and making no observations on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition after the state's counsel informed the court that the Sub-Divisional officer had issued a decision on April 16, 2026, and undertook to communicate it to the petitioner if not already done. The court directed the petitioner to review the decision and pursue appropriate legal remedies thereafter, while keeping all contentions open and making no observations on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts