Aditya Birla Capital Limited Tikshta Modi vs Ganesh Vijaykumar Kovvuru — EXA/2381/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure (Maharashtra Amendment) Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020255852025

e-Filing Number

13-08-2025

Filing Number

EXA/25584/2025

Filing Date

14-Aug-2025

Registration No

EXA/2381/2025

Registration Date

31-Oct-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure (Maharashtra Amendment) Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Aditya Birla Capital Limited Tikshta Modi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ganesh Vijaykumar Kovvuru

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Case Summary: EXA/2381/2025 The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple consolidated matters (Serial Nos. 902-925) because the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, following Supreme Court precedent that such appointments are void ab initio. The Court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, but permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded from calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 14-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2381/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: EXA/2381/2025 The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple consolidated matters (Serial Nos. 902-925) because the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, following Supreme Court precedent that such appointments are void ab initio. The Court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, but permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded from calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case