MADHUKAR ALIAS MADHUSUDAN PRATAPRAO KALAMBE vs MADHUKAR PARSHURAM NAVLE (PETITIONER) AND PRABHAVATI MAHADEO KALAMBE (DECEASED) — HCBM20254692024

Case under Indian Succession Act Section 276. Next hearing: 14th January 2025.

Next hearing 14-Jan-2025

CNR: HCBM020254692024

Filing Number

CTS/25462/2024

Filing Date

12-Aug-2024

Judge

Shri. S. B. Bhansali (Prothonotary Senior Master))

Coram

Shri. S. B. Bhansali (Prothonotary Senior Master))

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 06-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act Section 276

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MADHUKAR ALIAS MADHUSUDAN PRATAPRAO KALAMBE

    Adv. Advocate- ,SUBHASH G BANE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MADHUKAR PARSHURAM NAVLE (PETITIONER) AND PRABHAVATI MAHADEO KALAMBE (DECEASED)

Case History

  1. 14-Jan-2025

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay allowed Interim Application No.9951 of 2026, setting aside the previous rejection of Interim Application No.8899 of 2025 due to non-compliance with procedural rules, accepting the applicant's reasons for the three-day delay. Interim Application No.8899 of 2025 has been restored to the court file, with the applicant required to remove objections within one week and thereafter proceed strictly in accordance with law. The Caveat No.25462 of 2024 has also been restored, but the applicant must file an appropriate application to proceed with it lawfully. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Jan-2025

    Shri. S. B. Bhansali (Prothonotary Senior Master))View PDF

  4. 14-Jan-2025

    For Rejection Under Rule 986

    Shri. S. B. Bhansali (Prothonotary Senior Master))

  5. 12-Aug-2024

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay allowed Interim Application No.9951 of 2026, setting aside the previous rejection of Interim Application No.8899 of 2025 due to non-compliance with procedural rules, accepting the applicant's reasons for the three-day delay. Interim Application No.8899 of 2025 has been restored to the court file, with the applicant required to remove objections within one week and thereafter proceed strictly in accordance with law. The Caveat No.25462 of 2024 has also been restored, but the applicant must file an appropriate application to proceed with it lawfully. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case