SHRIRAM FINANCE LTD. (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE LIMITED) vs A S R CONSTRUCTION CO (BORROWER) — EXA/1061/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020253292024
Filing Number
EXA/25322/2024
Filing Date
09-Aug-2024
Registration No
EXA/1061/2025
Registration Date
14-May-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 07-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRIRAM FINANCE LTD. (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE LIMITED)
Adv. Disha Karambar and Associates
Respondent(s)
-
1.A S R CONSTRUCTION CO (BORROWER)
-
2.SABIR MOHAMEDALI KADAR(GUARANTOR)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 consolidated applications (Serial Nos. 32-221) because the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, making such appointments void ab initio following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International v. Airports Authority of India. Accordingly, all related arbitral awards and commercial execution applications were set aside. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the time period from original invocation excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
09-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. EXA/1061/2025
Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 consolidated applications (Serial Nos. 32-221) because the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, making such appointments void ab initio following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International v. Airports Authority of India. Accordingly, all related arbitral awards and commercial execution applications were set aside. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the time period from original invocation excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts