SHRIRAM FINANCE LTD vs A S R CONSTRUCTION CO. (BORROWER) — EXA/1064/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020252652024

Filing Number

EXA/25258/2024

Filing Date

09-Aug-2024

Registration No

EXA/1064/2025

Registration Date

14-May-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 07-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM FINANCE LTD

    Adv. Disha Karambar and Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.A S R CONSTRUCTION CO. (BORROWER)

  2. 2.SABIR MOHAMEDALI KADAR (GUARANTOR)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 consolidated applications and set aside arbitral awards where sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International ruling that such appointments are void ab initio. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the time spent in the invalidated arbitration excluded from limitation periods, subject to any written waiver agreements under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 09-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1064/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 consolidated applications and set aside arbitral awards where sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International ruling that such appointments are void ab initio. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the time spent in the invalidated arbitration excluded from limitation periods, subject to any written waiver agreements under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case