HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED vs HEMLATA MANUNATH HEGDE AND ANR — EXA/1458/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020251062022

Filing Number

EXA/25100/2022

Filing Date

04-Aug-2022

Registration No

EXA/1458/2023

Registration Date

20-Sep-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 07-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED

    Adv. SG Legal and Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HEMLATA MANUNATH HEGDE AND ANR

  2. 2.KALPANA MANUNATH HEGDE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 consolidated applications (Serial Nos. 32-221) following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International ruling that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio. The court set aside all arbitral awards and related commercial execution applications, allowing parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previous period excluded from limitation calculations, unless parties had expressly waived their right to object under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 04-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1458/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 consolidated applications (Serial Nos. 32-221) following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International ruling that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio. The court set aside all arbitral awards and related commercial execution applications, allowing parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previous period excluded from limitation calculations, unless parties had expressly waived their right to object under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case